Skip to content
Great North Tech

Tetris Didn't Succeed at This Gaming Ceremony — An Additional Classification Might Solve This

As any significant honors show draws close, you'll find a demand for the addition additional classifications to honor underappreciated efforts and delight the hearts of followers with niche passions.

My colleague previously argued for a horror game category. That would rule. So would board games, which is a dedicated supporter's campaign. But they will have to forgive me when I prioritize just as with other blinkered fanatics, I have a cast-iron argument supporting my request is the most urgent above others. The demand is this: We need a classification for brain-teasing titles.

Categorizing Game Types

Classifying creative works defies precise measurement; it’s very subjective, and it will always spark debates concluding with vague boundaries. This explains why movie academies steer clear of genre categories. Yet it remains a necessary evil in the world of video games, that demonstrate such variety they hardly constitute a single creative category.

For comprehensive acknowledgment of interactive entertainment excellence to gain proper attention, while allowing diverse titles to have a chance for representation, classification by type becomes crucial.

Present Award Structure

The major gaming awards offer these classifications covering Action-oriented games, Action/Adventure, RPG experiences, Combat games, Simulation and strategy titles, plus athletic and racing experiences. Between them, these six categories actually cover many game types, allowing placement for most games within them.

Different situation exists for brain-teasing titles. No suitable classification appears to accommodate them. Examine these examples from this year’s best games, showing diverse approaches: the architectural riddles from a specific release, intense tile-matching of another game, and the sweetly sociological logic puzzles in another game. What category would fit them between these six categories? Simply put, no category fits.

Recognition Challenges

Numerous examples exist outstanding logic titles published annually that have no home in entertainment awards, except when they manage to fit classification types such as Mobile Game, Virtual reality experiences, and the highly challenging independent game categories.

  • A renowned logic title got overlooked completely during that awards season
  • Another creative title missed out during that ceremony
  • A beloved organization game was overlooked recently
  • Just some puzzle games scraped into small studio or handheld classifications

Value of Brain-Teasers

Commonly they're compact experiences, however the design behind logic titles holds tremendous importance. Iconic mobile puzzle games count as the most-played games worldwide maintaining this status for an extended period.

The famous puzzle experience challenges famous sandbox experiences for the title of highest-selling title ever; it also contends for top gaming experience. Puzzle games are foundational within interactive entertainment, while interacting with almost every other genre.

The Solution and Justification

Brain-teasers wouldn't encounter that issue. It would be easy to populate multiple candidates with fascinating, diverse, deserving games each ceremony simply — or rather, with difficulty, given the need to exclude so many good games out.

And to reiterate, these include experiences lacking appropriate categories during prominent ceremonies. Brain-teaser creators function at the hard edge game development, creating some of essential manifestations of gaming itself. Similar to film action specialists, they warrant appreciation. Let’s not keep them waiting 35 years.

By

Jackie Pittman

A seasoned journalist with a focus on UK political affairs, bringing years of experience and a sharp analytical eye to her writing.

Great North Tech

Type to search articles.